Episode 33 – Counter-Revolution: Dutch Patriots, Tom Paine´s Rights of Man and the campaign against Seditious Writings

Faced with bloody terrorism democratic Europe has often reacted with tough measures. The UK Counter-Terrorism and Border Security Act of 2019 criminalizes expressing an opinion that is “supportive” of a proscribed organization if done in a way that is “reckless” as to whether it encourages support of terrorism. This makes it rather unnerving to jump into, for example, a Twitter thread on the age-old discussion of whether various groups are terrorists or freedom fighters. 

In this episode we’ll see how governments in the late 18th century reacted to a different kind of terror: the spread of revolutionary ideas and practice that shook the established order to the ground, including the actual Terror unleashed after the French Revolution spiraled out of control. Dutch “Patriots” took their cue from the American Revolution, using freedom of speech and hard-hitting newspapers to hammer away at the Stadtholder regime. How would the supposedly liberal and tolerant Dutch react when revolutionary ideas hit fever pitch in the 1780s.

In Britain, a pamphlet war between Edmund Burke and Thomas Paine unleashed an unprecedented discussion of first principles that energized the lower classes and frightened the government. Could Britain maintain the delicate balance between order and liberty while holding at bay both revolutionary ideas and armies of France?

In this episode, we will discuss:

  • How the Dutch “Patriot” movement used free speech and partisan newspapers to press for democratic reform and tolerance
  • How the pamphlet “To the People of the Netherlands” became a rallying cry of the Patriot side 
  • How the Stadtholder regime used repression and ultimately foreign invasion to silence the Patriots,
  • How the French Revolution briefly brought free speech and democracy back with the establishment of the Batavian Republic
  • How Burkes “Reflections on the Revolution in France” unleashed  a British pamphlet war for and against the principles of the French Revolution
  • How Thomas Paine´s reply to Burke – “Rights of Man” – became the world’s highest selling book and spread the idea of democratic reform to the masses 
  • How Prime Minister William Pitt responded by increasing repression of freedom of speech and assembly 
  • How the “Royal Proclamation Against Seditious Writings and Publications” unleashed a witch hunt for members of the democratic reform movement  
  • How Tom Paine became an enemy of the state, under constant surveillance, convicted of seditious libel and burned in effigy in towns all over Britain

Why have kings, emperors, and governments killed and imprisoned people to shut them up? And why have countless people risked death and imprisonment to express their beliefs? Jacob Mchangama guides you through the history of free speech from the trial of Socrates to the Great Firewall.

You can subscribe and listen to Clear and Present Danger on Apple PodcastsGoogle PlayYouTubeTuneIn, and Stitcher, or download episodes directly from SoundCloud.

Stay up to date with Clear and Present Danger on the show’s Facebook and Twitter pages. Email us feedback at freespeechhistory@gmail.com.



  • Barbour, J. (2009). ‘Wollstonecraft, Mary’. In: McCalman et al (eds.). An Oxford Companion to the Romantic Age: British Culture 1776–1832. Oxford University Press.
  • Bloy, M. (2017, April 23). The Age of George III. A Web of English History. Retrieved from here.
  • Burrows, S. (2015). ‘Censorship and press liberty in the Sister Republics – Some reflections’. In: Oddens, J., Rutjes, M., & Jacobs, E. (eds.). The Political Culture of the Sister Republics, 1794-1806 – France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Italy. Amsterdam, NL: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Davies, N. (1997). Europe: A history.
  • Fitzpatrick, M. (2009). ‘Priestley, Joseph’. In: McCalman et al (eds.). An Oxford Companion to the Romantic Age: British Culture 1776–1832. Oxford University Press.
  • Goldstein, R.J. (2000). The War for the Public Mind – Political Censorship in Nineteenth-Century Europe.
  • Goldstein, R.J. (1989). Political Censorship of the Arts and the Press in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, UK.
  • Goldstein, R.J. & Nedd, A.N. (eds.) (2015). Political Censorship of the Visual Arts in Nineteenth-Century Europe – Arresting Images. Palgrave Macmillan, UK.
  • Harling, P. (2001). The Law of Libel and the Limits of Repression, 1790–1832. The Historical Journal, 44(1), pp. 107–134.
  • Holmberg, T. (2002). ‘Great Britain: The Treasonable and Seditious Practices and the Seditious Meetings Acts (“The Gagging Acts”) of 1795’, ‘Great Britain: The King’s Proclamations Respecting Seditious Meetings, &c. 31 October and 4 Nov. 1795’, ‘Treasonable and Seditious Practices Act (36 George III, c. 7). 18 December 1795’, Seditious Assemblies Act (36 George III, c. 8). 18 December 1795, & ‘The Civil Code: an Overview. The Napoleon Series.
  • Human Rights Watch: European Union: Events of 2018. Retrieved from here.
  • Israel, J. (2013). Democratic Enlightenment: Philosophy, Revolution, and Human Rights 1750–1790. Oxford University Press.
  • Israel, J. (1995). The Dutch Republic – Its Rise, Greatness, and Fall 1477-1806. Oxford University Press, USA.
  • Jacobs, E. (2015). ‘1798: A turning point? Censorship and the Batavian Republic’. In: Oddens, J., Rutjes, M., & Jacobs, E. (eds.). The Political Culture of the Sister Republics, 1794-1806 – France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Italy. Amsterdam, NL: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Kean, J. (2003). Tom Paine: A Political Life. Grove Press.
  • Kloek, J. & W. Mijnhardt (2004) Dutch Culture in a European Perspective: 1800, blueprints for a national community. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
  • McCalman, I., Mee, J., Russel, G., Tuite, C., Fullagar, K., & Hardy, P. (eds.) (2009). An Oxford Companion to the Romantic Age: British Culture 1776–1832. Oxford University Press.
  • Mori, J. (2000). Britain in the Age of the French Revolution 1785–1820. London, UK & New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Oddens, J., Rutjes, M., & Jacobs, E. (eds.) (2015). The Political Culture of the Sister Republics, 1794-1806 – France, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and Italy. Amsterdam, NL: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Palmer, R.R. (2014). The Age of the Democratic Revolution: A Political History of Europe and America, 1760–1800. Princeton University Press.
  • Pelling, N. (2003). Anglo-Irish Relations, 1798–1922. London & New York: Routledge.
  • Philip, M. (2014). Reforming Ideas in Britain: Politics and Language in the Shadow of the French Revolution, 1789–1815. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Philip, M. (2011, February 17). Britain and the French Revolution. BBC History. Retrieved from here.
  • Philip, M. (1991). The French Revolution and British Popular Politics. Cambridge University Press.
  • Królikowska-Avis, E. (2017, April 26). ‘Europe’s first constitution’. pl. Retrieved from here.
  • Schama, Simon (1977) Patriots and Liberators: Revolution in the Netherlands, 1780-1813. London: Collins.
  • Tayler, L. (2017). ‘Overreach: How New Global Counterterrorism Measures Jeopardize Rights’. Humans Rights Watch. Retrieved from here.
  • Thale, M. (1989). ‘London Debating Societies in the 1790s’. The Historical Journal 32(1), pp. 57–86.
  • Tilly, C. (2005). Popular Contention in Great Britain. Paradigm Publishers.
  • Tombs, R. (2015). The English and their History.
  • Tuchman, B. (2011). The First Salute: A View of the American Revolution. Random House Publishing Group.
  • van Bunge, W. (2018). From Bayle to the Batavian Revolution – Essays on Philosophy in the Eighteenth-Century Dutch Republic. Boston & Leiden: Brill.
  • van Eijnatten, J. (2004). ‘Between Practice and Principle. Dutch Ideas on Censorship and Press Freedom, 1579-1795’. In: Yearbook for Political Thought and Conceptual History 8, pp. 85-113.
  • Velema, W.R.E. (2007). Republicans: Essays on Eighteenth-century Dutch Political Thought.
  • Velema, W.R.E. (2003). ‘Introduction to Elie Luzac, An Essay on Freedom of Expression (1749). In: Laursen, J.C. & van Zande, J. (eds.) Early French and German Defenses of Freedom of the Press.
  • Wass, E.A. (2006). ‘The Whigs and the Press, 1800–50’. Parliamentary History 25(1), pp. 68–87.

Primary Sources

  • Adams, J. (1780–1). Correspondence with Joan Derk van der Capellen. Retrieved from here:
  • Burke, E. [1790]. Reflections on The Revolution In France – In a Letter Intended to Have Been Sent to a Gentleman in Paris. Retrieved from here.
  • Constitution of Poland [1791, May 3]. From Ludwikowski, R. & Fox, W.F. (eds.) The beginning of the constitutional era: A bicentennial comparative analysis of the first modern constitutions (Washington, 1993: Catholic University of America Press). Retrieved from here.
  • European Commission (2018, September 12). State of the Union 2018: Commission proposes new rules to get terrorist content off the web. Retrieved from here.
  • European Commission (2018, March 1). A Europe that protects: Commission reinforces EU response to illegal content online. Retrieved from here.
  • King George III [1792, May 21]. Royal Proclamation Against Seditious Writings and Publications. House of Lords Journal 39: May 1792 21-30. (London, 1767-1830), pp. 431-458. Retrieved from here.
  • Paine, T. [1791]. Rights of Man: Being an Answer to Mr. Burke’s Attack on the French Revolution. In: Thomas Paine: Rights of Man, Common Sense, and Other Political Writings (Oxford University Press, USA: 1998). Online version retrieved from here.
  • Pitt, W. [1792, April 30]. Speech in the House of Commons. Retrieved from here.
  • Price, R. [1789, November 4]. A Discourse on the Love of Our Country. Retrieved from here.
  • Van der Capellen, J. D. [1781] An Address to the People of the Netherlands. English translation. Retrieved from here.