Episodes

Episode 41 – Free Speech and Racial Justice: Friends or Foes?

In May 2020, protests erupted all over the U.S. after a video emerged of a white police officer killing a black man named George Floyd. Millions took to the streets in support of racial justice under the rallying cry “Black Lives Matter.” Most protests were peaceful, but several cities experienced large-scale violence. Free speech was also affected in the process. A disturbing number of incidents of police brutality and excessive force against peaceful protesters and journalists were documented. President Trump accused a Black Lives Matter leader of “treason, sedition, insurrection” and labelled protestors as “terrorists.”

But demands for structural change also led to calls for de-platforming people whose views were deemed hostile to or even insufficiently supportive of racial justice. A Democratic data analyst named David Shor was fired after tweeting a study that showed that nonviolent black-led protests were more effective than violent ones in terms of securing voter support. In another instance, New York Times staffers protested that the newspaper put “Black @NYTimes staff in danger” by running a provocative op-ed by Republican Senator Tom Cotton, which argued for deploying the military to quell riots. The newsroom revolt led to opinion editor James Bennet resigning. 

Academia was affected too. A letter signed by hundreds of Princeton faculty members, employees and students demanded a faculty committee be established to “oversee the investigation and discipline of racist behaviors, incidents, research, and publication” and write “Guidelines on what counts as racist.”

Social media companies came under intense pressure to take a more robust stand on “hate speech.” 

The entrenchment of so-called “cancel culture” caused around 150, mostly liberal, writers and intellectuals to sign an open “Letter on Justice and Open Debate.” The letter argued against what the signers saw as “intolerance of opposing views, a vogue for public shaming and ostracism, and the tendency to dissolve complex policy issues in a blinding moral certainty.” The letter drew sharp criticism from many journalists, writers and intellectuals for being “tone-deaf,” “privileged,” “elitist” and detracting from or even hurting the struggle for racial justice.   

The wider debate often turned nasty especially on social media with loud voices on each side engaging in alarmist, bad faith arguments ascribing the worst intentions to their opponents. Many of those concerned about free speech warned of creeping totalitarianism imposed by “social justice warriors” run amok, intent on imposing a stifling orthodoxy of “wokeism.” Some confused vehement criticism of a person’s ideas with attempts to stifle that person’s speech. On the other hand, some racial justice activists outright denied the existence of “cancel culture” and failed to distinguish between vehement criticism of a person’s ideas and calling for that person to be sanctioned by an employer, publisher or university. Some even accused free speech defenders of being complicit in or actual defenders of white supremacy and compared words deemed racially insensitive with violence. 

Underlying these debates is a more fundamental question. Is a robust and principled approach to free speech a foundation for or a threat to racial justice? 

To help shed light on this question, this episode will focus on what role the dynamic between censorship and free speech has played in maintaining and challenging racist and oppressive societies. The episode will use American slavery and segregation, British colonialism, and South African apartheid as case studies.  

In this episode we will explore:

  • How Southern legislators and congressmen adopted some of the most draconian restrictions of free speech in American history, while Southern mobs enforced a “slaver’s veto” to curb abolitionist speech and ideas;
  • How Southern demands that the Federal government and Northern states actively police abolitionist ideas kicked off a debate over first principles and the role of free speech in America;
  • How Southern “cancel culture” purged a professor critical of slavery from the University of North Carolina;
  • How women played a critical role in mobilizing opinion against slavery and defying the slaver’s veto;
  • Why Frederick Douglass believed that “The right of speech is a very precious one, especially to the oppressed;”
  • How the First Amendment did little to end the discrimination and oppression of African-Americans immediately after the abolishment of slavery;
  • How the civil rights movement and its civil libertarian allies advanced group rights of discriminated minorities through the dramatic expansion of constitutionally protected individual rights, not least First Amendment freedoms;
  • Why recently deceased congressman John Lewis believed that “Without freedom of speech and the right to dissent, the Civil Rights movement would have been a bird without wings;”
  • How the British used laws against sedition and hate speech to target anti-colonial movements and silence dissidents like Mahatma Gandhi;
  • How Mahatma Gandhi viewed the freedoms of speech and association as “the two lungs that are absolutely necessary for a man to breathe the oxygen of liberty;”
  • How censorship and suppression was a key component of South African apartheid, which punished expressions “hateful against the white man” and kept an index of prohibited books to silence anti-apartheid activists;
  • How Nelson Mandela only abandoned peaceful resistance when the regime had shut down all lawful modes of expressing opposition to white supremacy;
  • Why Mandela believed that free speech should constitute a core value of South African democracy and that “No single person, no body of opinion, no political or religious doctrine, no political party or government can claim to have a monopoly on truth.”

Why have kings, emperors, and governments killed and imprisoned people to shut them up? And why have countless people risked death and imprisonment to express their beliefs? Jacob Mchangama guides you through the history of free speech from the trial of Socrates to the Great Firewall.

 

You can subscribe and listen to Clear and Present Danger on Apple PodcastsGoogle PlayYouTubeTuneIn, and Stitcher, or download episodes directly from SoundCloud.

Stay up to date with Clear and Present Danger on the show’s Facebook and Twitter pages, or visit the podcast’s website at freespeechhistory.com. Email us feedback at freespeechhistory@gmail.com.

Bibliography:

  • Acharya, B. (2015) ‘Free speech in India: Still plagued by pre-modern laws’. Media Asia 42(3-4): 157–160.
  • Adelman, L. (2013) The Glorious Jurisprudence of Thurgood Marshall. Harvard Law & Policy Review 7(1): 113–138.
  • Boyer, P.S. (2012) American History: A Very Short Introduction. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Branch, T. (1989) Parting the Waters: America in the King Years 1954–63. Simon & Schuster. Kindle edition.
  • Brückenhaus, D. (2017) Policing Transnational Protest: Liberal Imperialism and the Surveillance of Anticolonialists in Europe, 1905-1945. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Chimere-dan (1992) ‘Apartheid and demography in South Africa’. Etude de la Population Africaine (7), 26– 36. Retrieved from here.   
  • Coetzee, J.M. (1990) ’Censorship in South Africa’. English in Africa 17(1), 1–20.
  • Conklin, A. L. (1998) ‘Colonialism and Human Rights, A Contradiction in Terms? The Case of France and West Africa, 1895-1914’. The American Historical Review, 103(2), 419–42.
  • Comparative Hate Speech Law: Annexure (2012) Oxford Pro Bono Publico. Retrieved from:
  • Curtis, M.K. (2000) Free Speech, “The People’s Darling Privilege”: Struggles for Freedom of Expression in American History. Duke University Press.
  • Curtis (1995) ‘The Curious History of Attempts to Suppress Antislavery Speech, Press, and Petition in 1835–37’. Northwestern University Law Review 89(3): 78.
  • Darnton, R. (2014). Censors at Work: How States Shaped Literature, Pt. 2: British India: Liberalism and Imperialism.W. Norton & Company.
  • Drewett, M. (2017) ‘Exploring Transitions in Popular Music: Censorship from Apartheid to Post-Apartheid South Africa’. In: P. Hall (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Music Censorship. Oxford University Press.
  • Equal Justice Initiative (2017) Lynching in America: Confronting the Legacy of Racial Terror, 3rd Retrieved from here.
  • Fischer, L. (2006) Mahatma Gandhi – His Life & Times. Bombay, IN: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.
  • Fischer, L. (1983). The Life of Mahatma Gandhi. Bombay, IN: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.
  • Gordimer, N. (1976). ‘A Writer’s freedom’. Index on Censorship 5(2).
  • Goscha, C. (2016) Vietnam: A New History. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Greene, D. (2019) ‘The Inextricable Link Between Modern Free Speech Law and the Civil Rights Movement’. The Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved from here.
  • Hardin, R. & Hinton, M. (2001) ‘The Squelching of Free Speech in Memphis: The Life of a Black Post-Reconstruction Newspaper’. New Orleans 8(4), 78.
  • Hamilton, J.G.d.R. (2005) [1910] Benjamin Sherwood Hedrick: Electronic Edition. Retrieved from here.
  • Healy, T. (2013) The Great Dissent: How Oliver Wendell Holmes Changed His Mind – and Changed the History of Free Speech in America. Metropolitan Books. Henry Holt and Co.. Kindle Edition.
  • Hudson, D.L. (1999) ‘First Amendment Freedoms Crucial to Success of Civil Rights Movement’. Freedom Forum Institute. Retrieved from here.
  • Jordan, W.G. (2001) Black Newspapers and America’s War for Democracy, 1914-1920. The University of North Carolina Press.
  • Kalven, H. (1965) The Negro and the First Amendment. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
  • Kalven, H. (1964) ‘The New York Times Case: A Note On “The Central Meaning of the First Amendment”’. Supreme Court Review 191, 191–221.
  • Klarman, M.J. (1996) ‘Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions’. Virginia Law Review 82(1), 1–67.
  • Kornweibel, T. (2002) “Investigate Everything”: Federal Efforts to Ensure Black Loyalty During World War I. Indiana University Press.
  • Lange, M. de (1997) The Muzzled Muse: Literature and censorship in South Africa. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • Lewis, A. (1992) Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment.
  • McDougall, E. A. (2018) ‘A Story of Exile, a Story in Exile: Louis Hunkanrin, Mauritania and ‘Un Forfait Colonial’ (Revisited)’. In T. Green & B. Rossi (eds.) Landscapes, Sources and Intellectual Projects of the West African Past, Boston: Brill
  • Merrett, C.E. (1990) ‘In a State of Emergency: Libraries and Government Control in South Africa’. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy 60(1), 1–22.
  • Merrett, C.E. (1982) ‘Political Censorship in South Africa: Aims and Consequences’. Reality 14(2), 3–6.
  • Metcalf, T.R. (2008). The New Cambridge History of India, vol. 3.4: Ideologies of the Raj. Cambridge University Press.
  • Moroney, S. & Ensor, L. (1979). The Silenced: Banning in South Africa. Johannesburg: South African Institute of Race Relations.
  • Murphree, V. (2009) The Selling of Civil Rights: The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.
  • Newell, S (2016) ‘Paradoxes of Press Freedom in Colonial West Africa’. Media History 22(1): 101–122.
  • Newman, D. (2013) ‘British Colonial Censorship Regimes: Hong Kong, Straits Settlements’ & ‘Shanghai International Settlement, 1916–1941’. In D. Biltereyst & R.V. Winkel (eds.) Silencing Cinema: Film Censorship around the World. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Parfait, C. (2007) The Publishing History of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, 1852–2002. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Pasquier, R. (1962) “Les débuts de la presse au Sénégal” Cahiers d’Études africaines, 2(7), 477-90.
  • Rabbant, D.M. (1981) ‘The First Amendment in Its Forgotten Years’. The Yale Law Journal 90, 514–596.
  • Sampson, A. (2012) Mandela: The Authorized Biography. Vintage. Kindle edition.
  • Shiell, T. C. (2019) African Americans and the First Amendment: The Case of Liberty and Equality (SUNY series in African American Studies). State University of New York Press. Kindle Edition
  • ‘South Africa’s censorship laws’ (1975. Index on Censorship 4(2), 38-40: 38:
  • Stanley, J. (2017) ‘Civil Rights Movement Is a Reminder That Free Speech Is There to Protect the Weak’. American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved from here.
  • Thioub, I. (2005) “Savoirs interdits en contexte colonial: la politique culturelle de la France en Afrique de l’Ouest.” In Chanson-Jabeur, C. and Goerg, O. (eds.) Mama Africa. Hommage à Catherine Coquery-Vidrovitch.  Paris: L’Harmattan.
  • Tischauser, L.V. (2012) Jim Crow Laws. ABC-CLIO.
  • Wagner, S.R. (2019) The Women’s Suffrage Movement. Penguin Books.
  • Wasow, O. (2020) ‘Agenda Seeding: How 1960s Black Protests Moved Elites, Public Opinion and Voting’, American Political Science Review 114(3), 638–659. Retrieved from here.
  • Walker (1999)
  • Walker, S. (2012) ‘The Birth of the Civil Liberties Bureau and The National Civil Liberties Bureau, 1917-1919’. Mudd Manuscript Library Blog. Princeton University Archives. Retrieved from here.
  • Walker 1994

 

Primary sources

  • [1838] History of Pennsylvania Hall which was Destroyed by a Mob on the 17th of May. (New York: Negro Universities Press, A Division of Greenwood Publishing Corp, 1969). Retrieved from here.
  • Globe (1836) 24th Congress, 1st Sess., 3rd vol.
  • Cincinnatus [1836] Freedom’s Defense or a Candid Examination of Mr. Calhoun’s Report on Freedom of the Press (Worcester, MA: Dorr, Howland and Co., 1836).
  • Confederate States of America [1860] Declaration of the Immediate Causes Which Induce and Justify the Secession of South Carolina from the Federal Union. Retrieved from here.
  • Debs v. United States (1919) 249 U.S. 211. Retrieved from here.
  • Douglass, Frederick [1860] Plea for Freedom of Speech in Boston. 9 December, Boston, MA. Retrieved from here.
  • Douglass, Frederick [1854] The Kansas-Nebraska Bill. 24 November, Chicago, IL. Retrieved from here.
  • Emancipation Proclamation [1863]. 1 January. Presidential Proclamations, 1791–1991; Record Group 11; General Records of the United States Government; National Archives. Retrieved from here.
  • Emperor v Bal Gangadhar Tilak (1908) 10 BOMLR 848. Retrieved from here.
  • Espionage Act of 1917 [1917] 6 October. 106, §10(i), 40 Stat. 422, codified at 18 U.S.C. §§ 793-98. Retrieved from here.
  • Frohwerk v. United States [1919] 249 U.S. 204. Retrieved from: Frohwerk v United States [1919] 249 U.S. 204.
  • Ford, R.T., et al. (2020) A Letter on Justice and Open Debate. 7 July. Retrieved from here.
  • Gandhi, Mahatma [1921]. Speech at the Indian National Congress.. 29 December.
  • Gandhi, Mahatma [1922]. Statement in the Great Trial. 18 March, Circuit House, Shahi Bag, Ahmedabad.
  • Garner v. Louisiana (1961) 368 U.S. 157. Retrieved from here.
  • za. (1996) The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Ch. 2 art. 16(c). Retrieved from here.
  • za. (1961). Republic of South Africa Constitution Act. Retrieved from here.
  • za. (1983). Republic of South Africa Constitution Act. Retrieved from here.
  • Hedrick, B.S. [1852] Letter from B. S. Hedrick to D. L. Swain. Retrieved from here.
  • King, Martin Luther [1968] I’ve Been to the Mountaintop. 3 April, Memphis, Tenn. Retrieved from here.
  • Mandela, Nelson [1994] Long Walk to Freedom [1994]. (Little, Brown and Company, 2008). Kindle edition.
  • Mandela, Nelson [1994] Address to the International Press Institute Congress. 14 February. Retrieved from here.
  • Mandela, Nelson [1964] I am prepared to die. 20 April, Palace of Justice, Pretoria Supreme Court, Pretoria, SA. Retrieved from here.
  • NAACP v. Alabama [1958] 357 U.S. 449. (NAACP v. Patterson). Retrieved from here.
  • New York Times Co. v. Sullivan [1964] 376 U.S. 254. Retrieved from here.
  • The New York Times [1917] Columbia’s Deliverance. 10 October. Retrieved from here.
  • The North Carolina Standard [1856] Hedrick Once More. 5 November. Retrieved from here.
  • The North Carolina Standard [1856] Fremont in the South. Retrieved from here.
  • S v. Mamabolo [2001] (CCT 44/00) ZACC 17; 2001 (3) SA 409 (CC); 2001 (5) BCLR 449 (CC). Para. 37. Retrieved from here.
  • Schenck v. United States [1919] 249 U.S.47. Retrieved from here.
  • The State of Alabama [1835] ‘Copy of Indictment’. In: Documents of the Assembly of the State of New York, 55th, vol. 1.: 2 (Albany, NY: E. Croswell, 1836). Retrieved from here.:
  • Tocqueville, Alexis de [1985] Democracy in America. 11. (New York, NY: Pratt, Woodford & Co., 1848). Retrieved from here.
  • S. Const. amend. XIII [1865]. Retrieved from here.
  • S. Const. amend. XIV [1868]. Retrieved from here.
  • S. Const. amend. XV [1870]. Retrieved from here.
  • Wilson, Wilson [1915]. Third Annual Message. Retrieved from here.

 

Online articles and resources